digital SLR rebel Ideal for beginners!

Nikon sets a new benchmark in digital photography and presents a digital SLR camera that is so handy, lightweight and user-friendly as never before. The Nikon D50 is convincing in every respect.

Nikon Corporation focuses on the digital camera market, offering a new standard with the D50 digital SLR camera for entry-level lenses. It is primarily aimed at consumers who have already gained some experience with digital compact cameras and now want to use the undeniable benefits of digital SLR photography.

With the D50's outstanding image quality of digital SLR photography is so easy to reach as never before. This camera combine Nikon's expertise as a manufacturer of professional cameras, the latest digital technology and the excellent imaging performance of Nikkor interchangeable lenses. The D50 offers a variety of recording options, which can only offer a high quality digital SLR cameras - the benefits of digital SLR photography, such as the reaction speed and excellent image quality is so affordable for everyone.

I bought the Nikon D50 a few months ago and since then experimented much photographed, and verified the results.
The camera has many advantages that we in this price range usually finds difficult:
1. The service is easy to understand. After taking photographs in the simple functions such as delete or transfer has worked on PC, you can slowly work them into more difficult areas of manual that can also understand, pace, as the guide describes the function and the use of well-explained and described. Who's Afraid of blurred photos due to insufficient knowledge about aperture, shutter speed, etc., and the resulting incorrect settings may have to be perfectly satisfied with the Nikon D 50, since one with the automatic mode quickly and easily replaced by photos of the highest Qualitt.
2.The Save, organize and retrieve the photos is also easy to understand and cope with a few buttons. Even with many images on the memory card you can quickly find that what one is looking.
3.Extrem long battery life! For me there were not a 2000 photos as described above which has endured the battery, but some over 1000 Recharging is quick and easy.
4.HüBsches design and easy to transport.
5.Whereas various shooting modes allow photos from various situations look their best.

Besides these five main advantages of the camera, there are some other smaller, would enumerate now go too far. The only (minor for me) cons that I found in the Nikon D 50 are ...

1.Man the image which can be just like taking photographs in the viewfinder, but not on the screen (but the power of authentic Fotographieren see:))
2.The quality of the images when they reflect on the TV is not as good as I had expected, on the PC but can be recognized by my opinion, no defects.

Conclusion: For entry-level digital SLR photography is the Nikon D 50 is the ideal camera because it is easy to use and affordable, delivers high-quality images and has also a long period of no significant shortcomings.

www.slrdigitalrebel.com

read more “digital SLR rebel Ideal for beginners!”
share on: facebook

Canon EOS 5D Mark II Digital SLR Camera (21 megapixel) Housing

The EOS 5D Mark II full frame sensor and high resolution, continuous shooting up to 3.9 fps and the high ISO range. The innovative approach allows you to record full HD video
Features
21.1MP full frame CMOS sensor
DIGIC 4
ISO up to 25,600
Video recording Full HD (1080, 30 B / s)
3.0-inch VGA LCD with Live View mode
At 3.9 fps (JPEG)
9-point AF + 6 Help AF points
Magnesium alloy
I was taking pictures for 6 years as an amateur ambitious. My journey started with digital SLR cameras, the Canon 10D to 30D, it was, time for the 5D, the 5D Mark II update, I looked forward, even if there are things to improve the 5D is already good. When we also need to be clear, renewed the Canon 5D Mk II, is not at all.
The question of whether to buy a full frame or APS-C or H-format, each must decide for themselves. I mostly portraits, fashion, street, travel and architecture. Sports and animals in nature, so it's very fast and / or distant objects, are with me the exception. Therefore, decided several years ago for the full-frame 5D, and the series.
After 2 weeks of intensive testing with the 5D Mark II, here's my review and some comparisons in 5D Classic:
Hiring
After extraction, and is now the first positive impression of usehaptik GES?. The camera feels strong and grip than its predecessor. It is probably due to the grooves of the housing trivalent magnesium. Turn the wheel to have more endurance and racing's richest book. To ensure the welfare of measuring the improvement of the quality of the news for protection against moisture. The CF card door is always plastic, but lock in a better and more extremes of a continuum. The control buttons have changed little in its position and function. So the light display near the shutter release button (for me as logical to use) and press "Delete" and now the last button on the control buttons on the left of the screen and slide. (Warning to all ex-5D user, the location where the show "the image is" essential. KEYB Please hurry, or the photos are here!)
The depth has been moved laterally under the lock on the target. Although it allows greater ease of use, while the blow, but something told me that the problems on the performance of the device in Live View mode, as can be easily pressed. Aquí, todavían estoy acostumbrando an otra operación de la cámara.
Presentation:
In addition to seeing the Senate (LCD), which now, finally, the ISO is shown (and now also in the hole!) Has been installed, large and razor sharp 3 "screen. That alone is almost reasoning enough for ' update. 's brilliant, accurate color, and are still very good. The automatic brightness controls on the screen for different ambient light is also useful. The menu structures is divided into different folders, so for me a logical and easy to use . The number of adjustment options with additional features are also developed.
Viewfinder:
In direct comparison with me, as the new 5D viewfinder better. I consider myself a bit 'bigger, brighter and with better coverage of the image. Especially when you wear glasses, I am pleased with the improvement since the field of the lens limited vision anyway (the distance between the viewer).
Autofocus and measurement:
Not here, the 5D Mark II has really changed. The AF seems to be the same as the 5D. This is a very common criticism of knowledge, because there was no improvement. It would be an improvement in AF know object (for example, near the center, with other data such as points of cross-type sensors), but in my field of activity was sufficient 5D AF always sufficient and necessary, as most use the sensor in the center of my work. Here, Canon takes a different path of the Nikon AF treated as professionals and amateurs. Canon refers instead to a different camera, as the professional 1D Mark III, 50D, or less, better AF, faster continual shooting mode.
New Canon 5D, but the correction of microlensing data. This can be very different from the focal point of the lens is correct (front or back focus). I took my time and slow einjustiert. And, in particular the slow light, which have only a very narrow opening between home, more accurate results! Moreover, while the Live View function, examination of the importance of reliable indication of the sharpness.
Exposure seems to be identical to the old 5D. I found the Mark II as accurate as I am used to. White balances, however, AIM slightly improved. Inside, I have the little 'more exact values, but this is now a feeling and not a scientific comparison.
Cleaning the sensor:
Finally, the new 5D! Very often I have a way to change lenses a few grains of dust on the sensor. The opinion is so that when you look at home with the landscape design or architecture (opening) on the screen. Cloning and dust grains up to 300 photos is very boring. The 5D MK II is an automatic cleaning mechanism that shakes, dust particles are those of the probe. I had no traces of dust visible in my photos.
ISO
ISO options are incredible. Mark II can display the ISO from 50 to 25,600. And a wide range of this field is really useful. I try, if possible and appropriate to shoot at ISO 100. Here, the contrast and post-processing potential is greater. However, up to ISO 1600 are actually are very good results (correct exposure) achieved, which can be printed large. ISO 3200, I think also surprisingly good and totally useable. Some tests give impressions A4 standard ISO 6400 which recorded a noticeable loss of quality. For 10 X 15 photos, but still quite reasonable and preferable at any time by a blurred image. Called 12,800 and ISO 25600 (H1 and H2 of the camera) is better than no photo and a little more usable format. But please do not expect miracles!
ISO 50 (L) is more suitable for extremely bright or study situations where flash can not move enough, or if you need longer exposure times to produce the blur and no neutral density filter on hand.
Resolution:
21 MP ... In fact, I am not a friend of pixel madness that has become common in recent years as vermeindlich of quality? Tsinda for digital cameras. However ultimately this is how the pixels can be represented dissolve (color, dynamic range, noise) and as such pixel color transparent, distortion-free image can be?
I was really jumping 12-21 megapixel worry, because now 75% of the pixels have to share space on the chip without disturbing others. Fortunately, this concern was unfounded! The resolution, color rendition and dynamic range Excite me, the 5D Mk II, but much slower Vollformatkamera lens and 21 megapixel camera is ideal for showing the effective resolution of detail.
Unfortunately, many photographers tend to follow the best cameras to take root, but then save these goals. A good goal would be decade, a digital SLR camera body, but only about 3-5 years. A comparative tests with a good zoom is really scary. Compare to high-quality Canon 70-200 f / 4 L IS images look as if someone had smeared Vaseline on the front of the lens. Not always Canon "L" lenses, but with the zoom f / 4 Canon L series has very good hands, if you do not need the maximum intensity (I am absolutely delighted with these: 17-40, 24 -105 (very similar to "Ride On" and recommend Reiseobjektiv) and 70-200). But even without a fixed focal length "L" to make a good impression (50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 100mm f/2.8 macro).
The jump from 12-21 megapixels in real terms, a picture size of the production of 100% compared to "only" has about 1 / 3 lengths of greatest advantage. Expression with 12 megapixels and, for example 100 x 66 centimeters equivalent to 21 megapixels 150x100cm () for the selected resolution.
Image results:
The photographic results to convince the state of the sensor and processor technology. The resolution of detail (IS) lenses with an incredulous sound! And the ability to edit RAW files much larger than the old 5D.
However, the result of my concerns only the images that were photographed in RAW mode. JPG persuading results, is not enough detail in dark areas are a little 'muddy (too much noise?).
I recommend everyone to take his picture always in RAW. The files are larger, but the purchase of expensive camera as a high quality and does not guarantee results in a format like JPG Verlusstbehafteten.
And with a decent photo software such as Apple Aperture and Adobe Lightroom 2 is the treatment and management of the means of RAW also much easier.
Video:
The video is a nice feature that I think this has influenced my decision to buy, though. While it is great addition to the relatively heavy camera equipment do not even need to bring a camera, but with a normal film camera spontaneous or family holiday replaces the 5D II is not for me. It begins with the ergonomic burden on the video and control are still insufficient contrast AF. Even if you can now buy a full frame sensor and high-quality lenses for the film to watch quality films but also the lens to manual focus ring the little tight, but it is sometimes desirable act (thanks to the sensor and lens aperture may be the depth of 'very weak influence, sometimes much better than compact cameras, but as a precise control of FMD is more important because other films that focus on output. Since the great benefits of HD) Resolution no. Built-in microphone transmits sound from the SI (if any) and the zoom or focus and must be completed with an external microphone.
However who wants to enjoy a film, CAN) with a tripod, an external microphone and the exercise itself, the manual focus very concrete results (see website for sharing video or Canon.
Conclusion
The 5D Mark II is the 5D classic logical and coherent. Faster, better screen and viewfinder, and the convenience of cleaning the sensor or the Live View mode, the round-video output packet. The resolution and color reproduction of images in RAW mode are simply outstanding, from the perspective of today, and at this price, with good goals.
Canon continues its pattern of politics, and not everything that is technically possible to build the 5D Mark II. This remains the flagship of the series 1Ds reserved. The 5D Mk II, but is also 70% less than the 1Ds Mk III. Selon l'objectif of caméRa que vous avez à faire de petites concessions à La mise au point automatique, peut-être, ou de décider, mais pour le modèle, qui est le principal domaine d'application est le mieux à la couverture photographique.
With these technological advances, we must not forget that this is still the photographer who takes pictures of good or less good. The 5D Mark II is not a panacea and is used only in well-trained hands can achieve exceptional results.
In general, my assessment of my views and my goal in high school 1 --
Advantages
+ Better Housing
+ Best view
+ Much better view
+ Bessres control menu
+ Sensor Cleaning
Microadjustment + AF Lens
+ Live View
+ 3 custom function memory
+ Very high resolution lenses with a good
+ Color and dynamics in the RAW files are larger than the 5D
+ Behavior ISO 1-1.5 stops better noise
+ Ability for video professionals
Weaknesses:
- AF is enhanced by a new type of sensors rec
- AF mode video memory (Kontrastbasier because the mirror is a backup)
- Auto ISO can not be classified correctly
- ISO does not seem very accurate. I suspect that ISO 200 is actually quite 150th Window is a small room. The old 5D is near the true value.
PS I have no problem with firmware 1.06 and found no errors in the border area. An update to FW 1.07, I did.

http://www.slrdigitalrebel.com

read more “Canon EOS 5D Mark II Digital SLR Camera (21 megapixel) Housing”
share on: facebook

Good replacement for my current equipment digital slr

I opted for the Nikon D60 including the Nikkor 18-105 mm lens as a cheap replacement for my existing equipment - and am more than satisfied. So far, I wore a somewhat dated D100, before another D1x and a heavy 70-200/2.8, a 85/1.8 and two other lenses around with me. The result: Professionally, I used almost exclusively an enclosure with the telephoto zoom, but after the latest, two hours on the sidelines of a football game did not hurt any of the neck. And in the private vacation we have always taken our little Knips crate, even when making a clearly inferior photos.

Now to the D60: Of course it can not compete with the little Nikon many setting of semi-professional and professional DSLRs. But it offers a similar current cutting-edge technology from Nikon's house for a pleasant price and excellent size and weight. I find it pleasant to have a handy DSLR in action - and surpasses the quality of the photos in my case, the predecessor of the cameras many times. I have now with my yield a rate of 70 to 80% good pictures - before it was maybe 50%.

The D60 is something for DSLR beginners - but also for people who have to (price-conscious investing in good technology) and may waive manchnmal overly flashy equipment. And the quality produces the DSLR camera is always preferable to a higher category, yet - and Others because of better usability in low light conditions, because of the possibility of changing lenses, and because of the setting away from the program mode.
A word to the 18-105s zoom: It has through the engine and its built-in image stabilizer weight, but offers me a great quality for a large focal range (equivalent to approximately 27-160 mm). It is a "Immerdrauf" - and I can finally travel with my DSLR in the practical little bag in the holiday ...

I would buy it again.

read more “Good replacement for my current equipment digital slr”
share on: facebook

digital SLR D90 vs D5000

Two months ago I had purchased the brand new Nikon D5000 in the kit with the 18-200 lens. I could then be difficult to decide between the D90 and D5000. Ultimately, the swivel screen was decisive. I had always regretted not my decision and was very happy with the new Nikon. Unfortunately she passed away in a fall from a height of 5 meters to the victims.

I Have now bought the Nikon D90 with the same lens. Now I can indecisive prospects who can not decide between the two models indicate some experiences:

Benefits of the D90 compared to D5000:
+ Better feel and solid processing + Worlds to better display (920,000 pixels) + Shoulder-touch display and additional + Much larger and better viewfinder + More professional Special Features + Slightly better noise performance + Better and faster handling + Longer battery life

Disadvantages compared to the D5000:

- Lack of automatic Distortion (I miss) - A little heavier and slightly larger (not everyone is a disadvantage) - Display information for newcomers less understandable
My suggestion: bring more photographic experience of the prospective customer, the more likely he will be happy with the D90. The more inexperienced newcomer will be able to make friends with the D5000, the user guide offers a lot of support.

I personally benefit especially from the much larger and more powerful the viewfinder of the D90. The folding screen, I strangely did not miss. The higher resolution screen of the D90 is so blickwinkelunabh?ngig that he is just as suitable for ?berkopfaufnahmen or photos from the frog's perspective.

Conclusion: Measured by the small price difference for the D90, the D5000 provides significantly more for your money.

read more “digital SLR D90 vs D5000”
share on: facebook

1 Segment Price digital camera for enthusiasts at affordable prices

The EOS 300D is the first digital SLR camera in this price range.
In the Canon EOS 300D has installed a CMOS sensor with resolution of 6.3 megapixels. Our tester was equipped objetivar EF-S 18-55, which is sold only with the camera. The focal length Wechselobjetives focal length equivalent to an entire frame 29 to 88 mm small. This at least is a good choice angle. EOS lenses from analog cameras can be easily connected - but the small a factor extended focal length of 1.6. (What kind of tele-Uiversal as the availability of 28-300 is not much in the numbers 44-480 mm, but is a powerful lens is possible)

The autofocus works quickly and accurately. Select the priorities in the context, are defined with two handles. Quickly, the EOS 300D also traveling: It dissolves in reality, when you want. Since bringing the fun immediately!

The operation is considered, it is possible, even without studying the manual and run around the subject. The scene modes help with many rules quickly. Those who prefer to focus manually opening times and setup can explode. In difficult conditions of light to help spotting and metering more, otherwise the combs of measurement are very good results. The flash is outside the lens - minimizes the risk of red-eye reduction.

The control of the TFT display provides an overview of all guidelines. The TFT itself is very high, the brightness can be easily adjusted. To view the photos you can enlarge the images below to check the sharpness.

The first test has left a good impression: You are where the older sister EOS 10D is not.

It 'just have fun with the camera like a traditional SLR photography with high precision and speed. The camera is his claim as the Digital Rebel "- in other words, the United States - in its entirety. She Drives in terms of price / performance ratio of the market for digital cameras and is the highest Wechselobjetiv in the upper class, without which life difficult. persuading the full price for a "full digital SLR photographers who also have not changed course to have digital because the pact is too rigid and too slow, professional equipment and digital provision was too expensive.

Read More.

read more “1 Segment Price digital camera for enthusiasts at affordable prices”
share on: facebook

A total success! : digital slr rebel

I now have the combination of D90 with 16-85, after I sold the 18-105s again - the zoom range and processing have not convinced me. The 2mm wide one sense more easily and the 16-Lenses 85er feels much as the 18-valent to 105s (easy schrottiges plastic feeling), it has a metal bayonet and the proper distance scale, and VR II is smaller and heavier than the 18 -- 105s.

However, I'm around the lens a little concern, because it seems to give up lately, according to forum reports more 16-85er after a short use, the mind. Schaumermal ...

For the D90: the camera is the hammer, processing and noise performance are excellent, cannot compare with the Sony and Canon in this price range that I've tried lately. Shoot until 1600 or 2000 ISO-hearted, up to 3200 images can be recovered but are still predominantly. The camera is worth, even without the-discussed video feature, and certainly over-valued their money.
The video features requires, practice, but is still superior to their design in terms of the exemption and cinema camcorders and compact appearance.
Manual intervention options have been thoroughly when it is closer to (aperture, ISO, determination of the exposure employed). Sharpen you should anyway even if you want to control the eyes of his audience, but I have to practice first.

Liveview is for me only a few situations an alternative to the viewfinder, such as Macro, and since it does not interfere, that the AF is very comfortably in Liveview (that Sony may be better). The normal AF is good, though a step below the D300, but somewhere you have to delimit the cameras even from each other.
The camera is not sealed against water and dust, at Youtube, but there is a video of the D90 when climbing the Eiger () without a protective cover, rain also makes Nikon's usually nothing. A D300 is allowed to fall against even one time in the water, which will go with the D90 not good.

+ Noise performance! If you want more, probably needs to buy D700 or A900?
Hammer + display! It is so fun ...
+ Zoom in on the fast image control
+ Fast editing in the camera, if you develop once the road had a picture on the fly "" must.
+ Many custom functions, I have stopped there, much to adjust the camera to my taste.
+ Intuitive operation, like all Nikon, which I have used since 1990.
+ User-friendly menu, display the last settings, etc.

- No true mirror lock-up
- Bit rate of the videos could be higher.

Ah yes, the D90 is NOT the sensor of the D300, even if many think. It is a newly developed sensor based on the D300er sensor, the experts are still arguing whether he is really better. Some say, sharpness and pixel noise performance of the D300 is still slightly better, but images are so affected not only by the sensor, since there are other factoring in a camera, eg AA filter, electronic pre-processing of images, noise reduction, etc.

Read more.

read more “A total success! : digital slr rebel”
share on: facebook

Excellent in daily use - fully workable in practice digital SLR rebel reviews

With the camera I am completely satisfied. There are enough testing and reviews that describe the amazing features. I agree with the, but here are a few points for improvement:

- The video function is impractical. Problem is, the lens does not automatically focus - you must also manually re-adjust the sharpness! I hope for an early firmware update.

- The lens is no IF DF lens. Thus, about one third comes the zoom lens from the inside the lens and extends it. Actually, no problem, but when you shoot down sehrwohl this is a big problem. The lens simply extends (zoom), although it will not. Detention helps, but is not always advisable (eg, tripod shots, etc.).

Otherwise, full marks for body and flexibility of the lens. For any aspiring photographer, this combination three from last time. Who else wants the little more, not avoid the investment of additional lenses.

Personally, I would go to get this combination, despite these shortcomings yet again. However I would now be clear that I will still buy a more expensive lens (for example, then 1:2,8 70-200 mm Nikon with VR) / must.

Another tip:
The memory card should be very very fast and have been appropriating capacity of fast-moving images. I am using a Class 6 (30 MB / s) with 16 GB storage capacity. That is enough for the finest resolution and full pixel count in JPG format for almost 3000 photos. Sounds like a lot, but a holiday for one or two weeks and make appropriate interest in photography, the photos are up quickly - without that there would still room videos.

Tip 2:
I use the extra battery grip and have a second battery in the camera. Tip! Enough to forgive me for deleting the said about 3000 photos (including from time to time and) images. So highly recommended!!

Read more review.

read more “Excellent in daily use - fully workable in practice digital SLR rebel reviews”
share on: facebook