I am a semi professional photographer who draws with organizations usually much more expensive. Occasionally, however, carry a small camera with me for some reason, and this. Moreover, as many professionals and semi-professionals must have a body APS-C to use the cult followed Canon EF-S 10-22mm lens that works only for APS-C boids as rebels.
The rebels were, in fact, only go to meet these needs for many years. A large number of semi-professionals and professionals criticize the performance of these cameras and / or perceived weakness of ergonomics, size and characteristics. This is a camera body, $ 1000? No, it is not. This is a camera body, $ 2600? No, it is not. This is a $ 6999.99 camera body? No, it is not. I'm hammering this point home, because some people insist on comparing between camera rebel in this way. The comparisons are very good and the price is taken into account, left the equation of price, then yes, this device will probably lose a body whose cost is big.
Some of my random thoughts on this camera, I will not cover everything, because others have done very well. I will touch on issues important to me, a semi pro photographer, who sometimes need to travel light.
ISO performance (which is more important to me in any camera at any price):
ISO 100: No
ISO 400: Great (and professionally competent), with the exception of the more desirable that the noise in the shadows darker. Even RAW and post-treatment care is likely to leave the shadows alone and not take it too. I am a little 'uncomfortable here for the sake of being thorough examination, is not terrible by any means, or "ice-breaking" noise in the shadows.
ISO 800: for safer and better than expected, but the sound is certainly evident at this level - or rather the effects of noise reduction are visible - and in reducing the noise of the camera is aggressive enough that some detail and sharpness is lost because of the sound clean. Sure, but better used in smaller sizes (8x10 or less) in printing and publication.
ISO 1600: For me, it is beyond dispute. I have a higher level than the average consumer as a semi-pro, so keep in mind. I want to use this parameter only in a situation so serious that ISO 800 would be completely useless. Noise reduction at ISO 800 is too aggressive, but leads to the elimination of a loud noise. It seems that not even bother to ISO 1600. The noise is all in ISO 1600. I have not used a camera that I remember was a big difference between ISO 800 and ISO 1600. So the bottom line, in my humble opinion, you should stay away and use only in a pinch. I can not see anything above 4x6 print with this configuration. If this is your bag, then you probably will be fine.
I mean my views on the management of ISO that I purchased this camera for performance at high ISO sensitivity. If you decided to do it twice, I think. Is better than the Rebel, Rebel XT and Rebel XTi? Of course. You do well at high ISO? Not necessarily.
I do the vast majority of my shooting between ISO 100 and 400. I use fast lenses and usually run during the day. This is particularly true for the moment I am using this device. I'm not going to like this camera for high ISO performance. Why I take the 5D. I'm going with this camera for those exceptional moments when the 5D is not the best for your situation. This device offers exceptional image quality at ISO 100-400 and a useful ISO 800. For me, this is what counts. a 12MP DSLR with exceptional image quality for just over $ 500 is what it is. He throws a Canon lens of Nice (better lens) at a professional level and have acceptable results. I would not use this device, if these results are not available.
The only way the above 5D outshoot that is (in relation to picture quality) is that if you make enlargements or shooting above 400 ISO. If you use the proper glass, RAW and manual ISO setting (which is what I do) this is an impressive camera. I do not care if someone says the opposite, o. I do not - not - argue that point because I saw the results.
Now, if you have never used a rebel, I say that is much smaller than the 20D, 30D, 40D, organs, etc., which may or may not be used. It 'much more difficult for me to keep a good grip on the body, for example, the 40D. Again, this is fine with me, because I do not buy this for ergonomics. Once again, I'll buy it for consideration. Combined behavior of prices is how this happens in a place of courage. I have to keep repeating that, because for some reason, people have always felt the need to compare the cameras that are unmatched. If you are looking for the best performance in a DSLR with the best price, it is my firm opinion that is the camera.
Finally, I would say that if we speak strictly of image quality and nothing else, such as ergonomics and construction, in my humble opinion, the IQ of this device is good or better than the 40D slightly overestimated. Given the huge difference in the price of two - almost 100% in different situations - unless you're a fan of ergonomics, I think the decision is not rocket science. Buy this and save $ 500 for a glass better, or just save the $ 500 for no other reason than saving $ 500 is great. What I'm waiting for the road is there to compare the IQ IQ of 50D. Again, not less than the 40D, if we speak strictly on IQ. I returned the 40D last year after using it for 2 weeks. Simply not worth the price. The 40D to me is simply a Rebel XTi (XTi, XSi not), with better ergonomics.
visit: www.slrdigitalrebel.com
share on: facebook
0 comments:
Post a Comment